FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.
PMID: 28114192 · 2017
R, i, c, h, a, r, d, , A, , M, a, l, i, n, a, u, s, k, a, s, ;, , P, r, a, s, a, n, n, a, , H, a, r, i, h, a, r, a, n, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , W, , D, a, y, ;, , L, u, k, e, , H, , H, e, r, b, e, r, t, s, o, n, ;, , M, a, r, t, i, n, , B, u, e, s, e, n, ;, , U, l, r, i, c, h, , S, t, e, i, n, s, e, i, f, e, r, ;, , K, e, n, n, e, t, h, , I, , A, y, c, o, c, k, ;, , B, r, y, a, n, , C, , G, o, o, d, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , D, e, u, t, s, c, h, ;, , K, e, e, f, e, , B, , M, a, n, n, i, n, g, ;, , B, r, e, n, t, , A, , C, r, a, v, e, n
Publicidad
Resumen
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to develop blood-contacting medical devices. However, the lack of standardized methods for validating CFD simulations and blood damage predictions limits its use in the safety evaluation of devices. Through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiative, two benchmark models of typical device flow geometries (nozzle and centrifugal blood pump) were tested in multiple laboratories to provide experimental velocities, pressures, an
Publicidad
Fuente oficial
Ver en PubMed →Datos obtenidos de PubMed / NCBI. Para consultar el texto completo y la información más reciente, remítase siempre al registro oficial.