Collection and Analysis of Adherence Information for Software as a Medical Device Clinical Trials: Systematic Review.
PMID: 37966871 ·
E, m, i, l, y, , G, r, a, y, e, k, ;, , T, a, m, a, r, , K, r, i, s, h, n, a, m, u, r, t, i, ;, , L, y, d, i, a, , H, u, ;, , O, l, i, v, i, a, , B, a, b, i, c, h, ;, , K, a, t, h, e, r, i, n, e, , W, a, r, r, e, n, ;, , B, a, r, u, c, h, , F, i, s, c, h, h, o, f, f
Publicidad
Resumen
The rapid growth of digital health apps has necessitated new regulatory approaches to ensure compliance with safety and effectiveness standards. Nonadherence and heterogeneous user engagement with digital health apps can lead to trial estimates that overestimate or underestimate an app's effectiveness. However, there are no current standards for how researchers should measure adherence or address the risk of bias imposed by nonadherence through efficacy analyses. This systematic review aims to a
Publicidad
Fuente oficial
Ver en PubMed →Datos obtenidos de PubMed / NCBI. Para consultar el texto completo y la información más reciente, remítase siempre al registro oficial.