Aviso: Este sitio agrega datos públicos oficiales de la FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed y SEC EDGAR solo como referencia general. No constituye asesoramiento médico, diagnóstico, recomendaciones de tratamiento ni asesoramiento de inversión.

Ensayo clínico

Comparison of Two Versus Four Weeks of Ureteral Stenting Prior to Ureteroscopy After Failed Primary Ureteral Access

NCT: NCT07868874 · ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

ID NCTNCT07868874
EstadoENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Fecha de inicio2026-10-01
Finalización2027-03-31
SponsorPAEC General Hospital, Islamabad (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Resumen breve

This study proposes a non-randomized controlled trial comparing 2 weeks versus 4 weeks of DJ ureteral stenting in patients whose primary ureteral access failed during an initial attempt at FURS. The purpose is to determine whether a longer stenting period improves subsequent ureteral access. Participants: Adults aged 18-65 years with renal/upper ureteric stones ≤20 mm and failed primary access. Sample size: 198 patients - 99 in each group. Group A: Repeat FURS after 2 weeks of DJ stenting. Group B: Repeat FURS after 4 weeks of DJ stenting. Primary outcome: Successful placement of a 10/12-Fr ureteral access sheath during repeat FURS without additional dilation. Secondary outcomes: Stone-free rate and USSQ score. Stone-free definition: No residual stone fragment ≥4 mm on NCCT at 4 weeks after FURS. Analysis: t-test/Mann-Whitney U for numerical variables and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with p \< 0.05 considered significant.

Fuente oficial

Ver en ClinicalTrials.gov →

Datos obtenidos de la API de ClinicalTrials.gov. Para conocer el estado más reciente, consulte el registro oficial.

↑