FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.
PMID: 28114192 · 2017
R, i, c, h, a, r, d, , A, , M, a, l, i, n, a, u, s, k, a, s, ;, , P, r, a, s, a, n, n, a, , H, a, r, i, h, a, r, a, n, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , W, , D, a, y, ;, , L, u, k, e, , H, , H, e, r, b, e, r, t, s, o, n, ;, , M, a, r, t, i, n, , B, u, e, s, e, n, ;, , U, l, r, i, c, h, , S, t, e, i, n, s, e, i, f, e, r, ;, , K, e, n, n, e, t, h, , I, , A, y, c, o, c, k, ;, , B, r, y, a, n, , C, , G, o, o, d, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , D, e, u, t, s, c, h, ;, , K, e, e, f, e, , B, , M, a, n, n, i, n, g, ;, , B, r, e, n, t, , A, , C, r, a, v, e, n
광고
초록
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to develop blood-contacting medical devices. However, the lack of standardized methods for validating CFD simulations and blood damage predictions limits its use in the safety evaluation of devices. Through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiative, two benchmark models of typical device flow geometries (nozzle and centrifugal blood pump) were tested in multiple laboratories to provide experimental velocities, pressures, an
광고
공식 출처
PubMed에서 보기 →데이터는 PubMed / NCBI에서 제공됩니다. 전문과 최신 정보는 반드시 공식 기록을 확인하세요.