면책 고지: 이 사이트는 FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR 등 공식 공개 데이터를 일반 참고용으로 집계하며, 의학적 조언, 진단, 치료 권고 또는 투자 조언이 아닙니다.

임상시험

Drug-Coated Balloon Only Strategy After Recanalization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions

NCT: NCT07817719 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07817719
상태NOT_YET_RECRUITING
SponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General Hospital (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

간략 요약

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the coronary arteries are usually treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) after successful recanalization. Permanent metallic scaffolds carry recognized long-term limitations, including late malapposition, very late stent thrombosis, impairment of positive vascular remodeling, and edge restenosis after geographic miss. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) deliver an antiproliferative agent to the vessel wall without leaving a permanent implant, and may be particularly attractive in long, fibrocalcific recanalized CTO segments. NoTrace-CTO is a prospective, single-center, investigator-initiated, single-arm pilot study evaluating an exclusive DCB-only strategy, with no stent implantation, after successful CTO recanalization. Thirty-eight patients are planned, to yield thirty evaluable patients with paired angiographic follow-up. The primary endpoint is in-balloon late lumen loss at nine months, measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and tested against a pre-specified performance goal of 0.50 mm derived from a pooled contemporary second-generation DES benchmark. The proportion of lesions completing the DCB-only strategy without bailout stenting is reported descriptively alongside it. Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed at baseline, immediately after DCB delivery and at nine months is the mechanistic centerpiece of the study, assessing vascular remodeling directly. Secondary assessments include quantitative flow ratio (QFR), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, binary restenosis, reocclusion, target lesion and target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding classified by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, and acute kidney injury defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. The study is not powered for comparative clinical superiority or non-inferiority against DES; its findings are hypothesis-generating and intended to inform the design of an adequately powered multicenter trial.

공식 출처

ClinicalTrials.gov에서 보기 →

데이터는 ClinicalTrials.gov API에서 제공됩니다. 최신 상태는 공식 기록을 확인하세요.

↑