Collection and Analysis of Adherence Information for Software as a Medical Device Clinical Trials: Systematic Review.
PMID: 37966871 ·
E, m, i, l, y, , G, r, a, y, e, k, ;, , T, a, m, a, r, , K, r, i, s, h, n, a, m, u, r, t, i, ;, , L, y, d, i, a, , H, u, ;, , O, l, i, v, i, a, , B, a, b, i, c, h, ;, , K, a, t, h, e, r, i, n, e, , W, a, r, r, e, n, ;, , B, a, r, u, c, h, , F, i, s, c, h, h, o, f, f
Publicidade
Resumo
The rapid growth of digital health apps has necessitated new regulatory approaches to ensure compliance with safety and effectiveness standards. Nonadherence and heterogeneous user engagement with digital health apps can lead to trial estimates that overestimate or underestimate an app's effectiveness. However, there are no current standards for how researchers should measure adherence or address the risk of bias imposed by nonadherence through efficacy analyses. This systematic review aims to a
Publicidade
Fonte oficial
Ver no PubMed →Dados provenientes do PubMed / NCBI. Para consultar o texto integral e as informações mais recentes, recorra sempre ao registo oficial.