Aviso: Este site agrega dados públicos oficiais da FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed e SEC EDGAR apenas para referência geral. Não constitui aconselhamento médico, diagnóstico, recomendação de tratamento ou aconselhamento de investimento.

Ensaio clínico

Prospective Comparative Analysis of ACDF vs Fusion Interbody Cages With nanoLOCK Osseointegrative Technology

NCT: NCT05762055 · ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

ID NCTNCT05762055
EstadoENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Data de início2024-02-05
SponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Resumo breve

Study team will plan a prospective, randomized control trial using our institution's spine clinical outcomes registry. Eligible patients undergoing ACDF (see inclusion criteria listed below) will be randomized to an Intervention or Control Group, which will differ according to the interbody cage used during the procedure. In the Intervention Group (100 patients), Medtronic Titan Endoskeleton TCS zero-profile, stand-alone interbody cages with nanoLOCK osseointegrative technology will be implanted at each treated level. In the Control Group (100 patients), patients will receive an alternative interbody cage system that does not employ nanoLOCK ossteointegrative technology. Interbody cages used in the Control Group (along with the decision to apply anterior plate fixation) will be determined according to surgeon preference. There will be no blinding to the type of implant used. Standard demographic and procedural variables will be collected for all patients (including history of diabetes, tobacco, use, prior use of oral corticosteroids, number of levels fused, and presence of bicortical screw placement). Clinical and radiographic outcomes in the Intervention and Control Groups will be directly compared.

Fonte oficial

Ver no ClinicalTrials.gov →

Dados provenientes da API do ClinicalTrials.gov. Para consultar o estado mais recente, veja o registo oficial.

↑