Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

PubMed

Safety profiles of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from 2009 to 2016.

PMID: 28988455 · 2018

JournalJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Year2018
PMID28988455

Abstract

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a viable option for AF patients who are unable to tolerate long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). We sought to assess the safety of two commonly used percutaneous devices for LAA closure in the United States by analysis of surveillance data from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The MAUDE database was queried between May 1, 2006 and May 1, 2016 for LARIAT LAAC was performed with LARIAT in 4,889 cases. WA

Official Source

View on PubMed →

Data sourced from PubMed / NCBI. For the full text and most current information, always refer to the official record.