Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

PubMed

Regulatory gaps in India's medical device framework: The case of Johnson and Johnson's faulty hip implants.

PMID: 39744726 · 2024

JournalWorld journal of orthopedics
Year2024
PMID39744726

Abstract

The Johnson and Johnson faulty hip implant case represents one of the most significant crises in medical device history, impacting nearly 93000 patients worldwide. In response to alarming failure rates and a global recall in August 2010, countries such as Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom quickly implemented revision surgeries and reimbursement programs to protect patient safety. In stark contrast, India's response was alarmingly delayed; defective implants continued to be sol

Official Source

View on PubMed →

Data sourced from PubMed / NCBI. For the full text and most current information, always refer to the official record.