Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

PubMed

Fertile-window misclassification in period-tracking applications and associated pregnancy risk: a large observational analysis.

PMID: 42145202 · 2026

JournalThe European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception
Year2026
PMID42145202

Abstract

Given the widespread contraceptive use of period-tracking applications, we aimed to quantify misclassification of biologically fertile days and associated pregnancy risk by calendar-based and BBT-supported period-tracking applications and compare it with an FDA-cleared and CE-marked digital contraceptive. We conducted an observational analysis of 543,167 cycles from users of a fertility application. Biologically fertile days were identified using urinary luteinizing hormone tests. Outcomes inclu

Official Source

View on PubMed →

Data sourced from PubMed / NCBI. For the full text and most current information, always refer to the official record.