Отказ от ответственности: Этот сайт агрегирует общедоступные официальные данные FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed и SEC EDGAR только для общей справки. Он не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом, рекомендацией по лечению или инвестиционным советом.

Клиническое исследование

Topical Versus Injection PRP for Olfactory Dysfunction

NCT: NCT07151703 · RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07151703
СтатусRECRUITING
Дата начала2025-09-11
Завершение2028-12-31
SponsorTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan (OTHER_GOV)
First posted
Last updated

Краткое описание

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether two different delivery methods of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can improve olfactory function in adults with persistent olfactory dysfunction lasting more than three months. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does carrier-assisted topical application of PRP lead to comparable or better improvement in smell function than intranasal injection of PRP? 2. Which method provides greater patient comfort and fewer adverse effects? Researchers will compare carrier-assisted topical PRP application to intranasal PRP injection to see if one approach is more effective in restoring olfactory function. Participants will: 1. Receive a single PRP treatment delivered either by injection or via a PRP-soaked carrier placed into the olfactory cleft. 2. Continue daily olfactory training for three months following the intervention. 3. Undergo smell testing (Sniffin' Sticks) before and after treatment and complete quality-of-life questionnaires.

Официальный источник

Открыть на ClinicalTrials.gov →

Данные получены через API ClinicalTrials.gov. Актуальный статус смотрите в официальной записи.

↑