CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
NCT: NCT00213681 · COMPLETED
Brief Summary
To evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure more rapidly improves ventilation than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute pulmonary edema. CPAP is delivered via a simple device connected to oxygen.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema?
CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema is a clinical trial registered under NCT00213681. Current status: COMPLETED.
What is the status of NCT00213681?
The current status of NCT00213681 (CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema) is: COMPLETED.
When did CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema start?
CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema started on 2002-11.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.