Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein

NCT: NCT00221715 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT00221715
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2002-07
Completion2011-05
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Bordeaux (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

When medical treatments fail, critical ischemia of the lower limb often leads to surgery, i.e. above knee femoro popliteal bypass. This bypass can be performed either with DACRON or PTFE prosthesis or with the autologous saphenous vein. Both technics are used but they have not been compared regarding bypass permeability and limb salvage. Thus, this study will compare the permeability rate of above knee femoro popliteal surgery whether performed with autologous vein versus prosthesis

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein?

Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein is a clinical trial registered under NCT00221715. Current status: COMPLETED.

What is the status of NCT00221715?

The current status of NCT00221715 (Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein) is: COMPLETED.

When did Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein start?

Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein started on 2002-07.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.