Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing

NCT: NCT00698607 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT00698607
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2008-06
Completion2014-04

Brief Summary

Objectives 1. To evaluate the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus-eluting coronary stent system(EECSS) (XIENCETM V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, PromusTM, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), compared with the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system(SECSS) (CypherTM, Cordis Johnson \& Johnson, Warren, NJ) in the treatment of coronary stenosis. 2. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6-month clopidogrel therapy compared with 12-month clopidogrel therapy. Study Design: Prospective, open label, two-arm, randomized multi-center trial to test the non-inferiority of EECSS compared with the SECSS, and to test the non-inferiority of 6 months duration compared with 12 months duration of clopidogrel therapy. Patients will be randomized in a two by two factorial manner according to the type of drug eluting stent (EECSS vs. SECSS) and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (6 months vs. 12 months). Randomization will also be stratified per hospital for the presence of DM and the presence of long lesions (lesion length ≥ 28mm) Patient Enrollment: 1,372 patients enrolled at 17 centers in Korea. Patient Follow-Up: Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 3, and 9 months, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Investigator or designee may conduct follow-up as telephone contacts or office visits. Primary Endpoint * In-segment late luminal loss (LL) at 9 months for comparison of stenting with EECSS vs. SECSS. * Target vessel failure (TVF) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemia driven target vessel revascularization) at 12 months for comparison of 6 months vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy Secondary Endpoint * All Death * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction * Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (all and ischemia-driven) * Target lesion revascularization (TLR) (all and ischemia-driven) * Stent thrombosis * Acute success (device, lesion, and procedure) * Bleeding * Cerebrovascular accident * In-stent LL at 9 months * Angiographic pattern of restenosis at 9-month angiographic follow-up * In-stent and in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 9 months * In-stent % volume obstruction (%VO) at 9 months * Incomplete stent apposition post index procedure * Persisting incomplete stent apposition, late-acquired incomplete stent apposition, aneurysm, thrombosis, and persisting dissection at 9 months

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing?

Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing is a clinical trial registered under NCT00698607. Current status: COMPLETED.

What is the status of NCT00698607?

The current status of NCT00698607 (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing) is: COMPLETED.

When did Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing start?

Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing started on 2008-06.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.