Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior

NCT: NCT01974362 · RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT01974362
StatusRECRUITING
Completion2029-12-31
SponsorImplantology Institute (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

In patients rehabilitated with a full-arch (maxillary and/or mandibular) implant-supported fixed prosthesis, do three CAD/CAM zirconia framework designs - porcelain-veneered zirconia (PVZ), monolithic zirconia with buccal veneer (MZ) and full-contour monolithic zirconia (FCMZ) - differ in the incidence of post-insertion technical complications, in particular ceramic chipping, and in prosthesis survival and success after at least 1 year in function? This prospective observational study, conducted in a private clinical setting, compares the three designs regarding technical and biological complications, prosthesis survival and success (Alpha/Bravo/Charlie/Delta classification) and implant success, and examines the influence of arch, number of implants, opposing dentition and cantilever extension on the occurrence of complications.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑