Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA

NCT: NCT02278601 · ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT02278601
StatusACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Start Date2015-01-28
Completion2027-12-31
SponsorKK Women's and Children's Hospital (OTHER_GOV)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard of pain relief for labour pain. Despite this, more than 50% of parturients continue to experience pain leading to suffering and increased caregiver workload. Women who have increased pain tend to have lower successful patient bolus demands when patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is utilised and have dysfunctional labour requiring obstetric intervention such as Caesarean or instrumental delivery. Labour pain often escalates and worsens as labour progresses requiring an individualized, variable, flexible analgesic regimen. Bolus epidural administrations have been shown to improve uniform spread of local anaesthetics with better pain relief, compared to fixed background infusions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA?

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA is a clinical trial registered under NCT02278601. Current status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT02278601?

The current status of NCT02278601 (Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA) is: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.

When did Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA start?

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA started on 2015-01-28.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.