Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone

NCT: NCT04079387 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT04079387
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2019-10-01
Completion2020-06-15
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Montpellier (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU) often require respiratory support. Orotracheal intubation is one of the most frequent procedures performed in ICU.When performed in emergency settings, intubation is a challenging issue as it may be associated with life-threatening complications in up to one third of cases Using a preshaped endotracheal tube plus stylet may have potential advantages over endotracheal tube alone without stylet. The stylet is a rigid but malleable introducer which fits inside the endotracheal tube and allows for manipulation of the tube shape; usually into a hockey stick shape, to facilitate passage of the tube through the laryngeal inlet. The stylet can help to increase success of intubation in operating rooms

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone?

Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone is a clinical trial registered under NCT04079387. Current status: COMPLETED.

What is the status of NCT04079387?

The current status of NCT04079387 (Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone) is: COMPLETED.

When did Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone start?

Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone started on 2019-10-01.

Related Devices

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.