High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT: NCT04664322 · COMPLETED
Brief Summary
This physiological study showed an increase in regional ventilation with NIV but no difference in alveolar recruitment as compared to HFNC in patients with hypoxemic ARF. Although NIV provided better oxygenation than HFNC, the effect on lung volumes could explain the potentially deleterious effect of NIV in hypoxemic ARF, reinforcing the recently developed concept of patient self-inflicted lung injury.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure?
High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure is a clinical trial registered under NCT04664322. Current status: COMPLETED.
What is the status of NCT04664322?
The current status of NCT04664322 (High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure) is: COMPLETED.
When did High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure start?
High-flow Oxygen Therapy vs Non-invasive Ventilation: Comparison of Alveolar Recruitment in Acute Respiratory Failure started on 2016-02-22.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.