Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery
NCT: NCT05168943 · RECRUITING
Brief Summary
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of nylon (polyamide) epidural catheter versus polyurethane epidural catheter in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Background: Continuous epidural anesthesia is the most common anesthetic technique used in orthopedic surgery. However, the use of epidural catheters is associated with complications. The insertion of the catheter may be associated with intravascular or intrathecal placement, nerve root irritation, paresthesia, kinking, hematoma, or breakage during catheter removal. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups; group N, using Nylon catheter, and group P, using Polyurethane catheter.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery?
Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery is a clinical trial registered under NCT05168943. Current status: RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT05168943?
The current status of NCT05168943 (Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery) is: RECRUITING.
When did Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery start?
Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery started on 2026-07-01.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.