Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg

NCT: NCT05766579 · ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT05766579
StatusACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Start Date2019-04-02
Completion2026-12-31
SponsorIRCCS Policlinico S. Donato (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Endovascular thermal ablation is currently considered as the best procedure for treating varicose veins thanks to its mini-invasiveness and the lowest rate of incidence of complications. At the end of the endovascular ablation procedure, the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend the use of the compression stockings to reduce postoperative pain and the incidence of edema and thrombotic complications. Despite this, the duration, type and degree of compression to be used, particularly after radiofrequency ablation procedures, remain a matter of debate. Furthermore, although the benefits of postoperative elastic compression therapy are well known, there is various evidence demonstrating how patients often experience poor comfort in wearing stockings, especially those with a higher degree of compression, which causes poor compliance with therapy. In light of all this, each center recommends the use of elastic compression stockings in the postoperative period with a degree of compression that varies, however, according to internal protocols. There is currently no work in the literature that compares the advantages and disadvantages of using elastic compression stockings with a K2 versus K1 compression degree after radiofrequency ablative surgery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg?

Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg is a clinical trial registered under NCT05766579. Current status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT05766579?

The current status of NCT05766579 (Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg) is: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.

When did Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg start?

Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg started on 2019-04-02.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.