Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems
NCT: NCT05815953 · ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
A randomised controlled trial comparing a recently introduced femoral stem with an established stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA). 60 patients will be randomised into one of the two groups 1. Polarstem uncemented femoral stem (Smith \& Nephew) 2. Corail uncemented femoral stem (De Puy) All patients will receive a 32mm cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral head and an R3 acetabular cup with a 10 Mrad highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liner (Smith \& Nephew). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) will be used to measure stem migration. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements will be used to measure bone mineral density. Clinical outcome will be assessed at different time point to evaluate satisfaction and function. Data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register will be used to investigate the risk of revision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems?
Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems is a clinical trial registered under NCT05815953. Current status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT05815953?
The current status of NCT05815953 (Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems) is: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
When did Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems start?
Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems started on 2017-06-20.
Related Devices
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.