Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Continuous Versus Intermittent Ward Monitoring

NCT: NCT06232876 · RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT06232876
StatusRECRUITING
Start Date2026-08-17
Completion2029-03-01
SponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

The investigators will randomize adults having major non-cardiac inpatient surgery to blinded versus unblinded continuous postoperative vital sign monitoring (saturation, ventilation, and heart rate). The investigators will use a wearable, untethered, and battery-powered sensor (Masimo Radius PPG, Masimo, Irvine, CA) that wirelessly connects to a Masimo monitor and continuously records saturation, ventilation, and pulse rate. The primary outcome will be areas-exceeding-thresholds for desaturation (\<85%), bradypnea (\<7 breaths/min), tachypnea (\>30 breaths/min), tachycardia (heart rate \>130 beats/min), and bradycardia (heart rate \<45 beats/min). These exposure thresholds represent a balance between events that are clinically meaningful and excessive alarms that will discourage clinician participation. The investigators expect about 1 alert per patient per day with these thresholds, with most being considered informative or actionable by nurses. In unblinded patients, clinician alerts will be activated at these thresholds.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑