Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
NCT: NCT06308640 · ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental changes of bone supported Fast Back and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander in bilateral distalization of maxillary molars using CBCT in Egyptian people. The main question it aims to answer are: • If bone supported Fast Back and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander will be effective in bilateral distalization of maxillary molars The patients will be selected according to the following criteria: 1. Patient with full permanent dentition. 2. Good oral hygiene. 3. None of the patients had received any orthodontic treatment. 4. Class II molar relationship. 5. Minimal or no crowding in the mandibular arch. 6. Non-extraction treatment plan with molar distalization. 7. Low angle cases. 8. No medical problems or active periodontal disease. Researchers will compare between bone supported Fast Back appliance and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated and see if they will be effective in maxillary molars distalization.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography?
Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography is a clinical trial registered under NCT06308640. Current status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT06308640?
The current status of NCT06308640 (Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography) is: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
When did Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography start?
Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography started on 2024-03-10.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.