Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery

NCT: NCT06815367 · RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT06815367
StatusRECRUITING
Start Date2024-01-15
Completion2026-05-01

Brief Summary

Both BFR and intermittent pneumatic compression are purported to decrease symptoms associated with exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) that cause delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Blood flow restriction relies on applying pressurized cuffs to the most proximal portion of the limb. Another form of recovery often relied upon is pneumatic compression. The mechanism by which pneumatic compression works is similar to that of a massage, whereby the device progressively increases the pressure on a portion of the limb before releasing and moving further up the limb.The purpose of this study is determine whether BFR or pneumatic compression can be used to decreased DOMS which may indicate enhanced recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery?

Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery is a clinical trial registered under NCT06815367. Current status: RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT06815367?

The current status of NCT06815367 (Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery) is: RECRUITING.

When did Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery start?

Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery started on 2024-01-15.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.