Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.

NCT: NCT06837870 · ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

NCT IDNCT06837870
StatusENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Start Date2025-07-11
Completion2027-01-01

Brief Summary

The study will be a randomized comparison of percutaneous suture-mediated closure (SMC) versus manual compression with a superficial figure-of-eight suture (MC) for large bore venous access used for leadless pacemaker implantation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.?

Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation. is a clinical trial registered under NCT06837870. Current status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION.

What is the status of NCT06837870?

The current status of NCT06837870 (Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.) is: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION.

When did Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation. start?

Percutaneous Closure Versus Figure-of-eight Suture for Hemostasis in Leadless Pacemaker Implantation. started on 2025-07-11.

Related Devices

PMA P150033 Leadless pacemaker Medtronic, Inc.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑