Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children
NCT: NCT07186673 · RECRUITING
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed using the Hall Technique versus the conventional method in the restoration of permanent first molars in children, and to evaluate their effects on occlusal relationships, crown adaptation, and patient satisfaction. Study Outcomes The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed on permanent first molars using the Hall Technique in comparison to the conventional crown placement method. The secondary outcomes included assessment of the marginal fit and adaptation of preformed crowns using both techniques, analysis of changes in occlusal relationships-specifically the vertical dimension of occlusion and overbite-and evaluation of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale at multiple time points: immediately post-treatment, and at one, three, and six months.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children?
Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children is a clinical trial registered under NCT07186673. Current status: RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT07186673?
The current status of NCT07186673 (Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children) is: RECRUITING.
When did Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children start?
Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children started on 2025-12-01.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.