Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis

NCT: NCT07236554 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT07236554
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2025-09-15
Completion2026-03-15

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) verses Mulligan's technique in improving pain, grip strength, and functional outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis?

Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis is a clinical trial registered under NCT07236554. Current status: COMPLETED.

What is the status of NCT07236554?

The current status of NCT07236554 (Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis) is: COMPLETED.

When did Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis start?

Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Mulligan Technique in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis started on 2025-09-15.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑