Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy

NCT: NCT07251881 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07251881
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-05
Completion2027-07

Brief Summary

During certain heart surgeries, the sternum is opened and must then be closed securely. The study compares two closure methods - steel wires and SuperCable - in terms of stability, healing, and patient satisfaction. This investigation aims to demonstrate that the iso-elastic properties of the SuperCable Sternal Closure System result in faster sternal bone healing, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and improved physical recovery compared to conventional steel wire sternal closure. Eighty-six patients are participating and are randomly assigned to one of the two groups. After the operation, pain, healing, and possible complications are checked. The patients are examined 3 and 6 months after the operation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy?

SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy is a clinical trial registered under NCT07251881. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07251881?

The current status of NCT07251881 (SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy start?

SuperCable vs. Conventional Steel Wire for Closure After a Median Sternotomy started on 2026-05.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.