Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

NCT: NCT07357168 · ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

NCT IDNCT07357168
StatusENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Start Date2026-01-01
Completion2026-04-20

Brief Summary

This study will be carried out on seventy five elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Their age will range from 60 to 75 years old. They will be recruited from Hoda Talaat Harb geriatric care center, Helwan governorate, Egypt. The aim of this study to investigate the effect of Electromagnetic field versus aerobic exercise on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a nonmalignant enlargement of the prostate gland and refers to the stromal and glandular epithelial hyperplasia that occurs in the transition zone of the prostate Clinically, the condition manifests with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) consisting of obstructive (weak urination stream, incomplete bladder emptying, hesitancy) and irritative symptoms (frequency, urgency, nocturia). It is important to note that LUTS can result from a variety of conditions including problems relating to bladder innervation and aging as well as the outflow obstruction caused by BPH. LUTS due to BPH increases with age, BPH was primarily treated surgically for many years, however, in the 1990s this was superseded by the medical approaches that are now the front line therapy. 5α-reductase inhibitors such as finasteride and dutasteride and α-adrenergic blockers such as doxazosin and tamsulosin are used to shrink and relax the organ, respectively. The MTOPS study demonstrated that a combination of the α-blocker Doxazosin and the 5α-reductase inhibitor Finasteride are more effective at reducing LUTS progression than either drug given alone. While these approaches are effective in many patients, a significant proportion, in the range of 35%, showed progressive disease even in the face of the two drug combination,The Electromagnetic field is thought to have the ability to affect the cells that induce different cellular changes , present studies prove that molecular synergies may not remain the unique determinants implicated in the biological interface. EMF possesses numerous well-reported biological effects including inflammation and pain suppression. This therapy is noninvasive, secure, and easy to use for treating the origin of discomfort, damage, and inflammation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia is a clinical trial registered under NCT07357168. Current status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION.

What is the status of NCT07357168?

The current status of NCT07357168 (Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) is: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION.

When did Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia start?

Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Aerobic Exercise on Prostatic Function in Elderly With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia started on 2026-01-01.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.