Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions
NCT: NCT07491276 · ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
This clinical study aims to compare the efficacy of knotless barbed sutures versus N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue tissue adhesive for the closure of intra-oral surgical incisions, with traditional PGA vicryl sutures as a control group. The study evaluates three primary outcomes: the time required for incision closure, postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and the soft tissue healing progress using Landry's wound healing index. Secondary outcomes will include the assessment of postoperative edema and other clinical healing parameters. The goal is to determine which closure technique provides superior surgical efficiency, less patient discomfort, and better wound healing in oral and maxillofacial procedures.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions?
Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions is a clinical trial registered under NCT07491276. Current status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT07491276?
The current status of NCT07491276 (Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions) is: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING.
When did Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions start?
Efficacy of Using Knotless Barbed Suture vs N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Tissue Adhesive for Closure of Intraoral Surgical Incisions started on 2025-06-16.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.