Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment
NCT: NCT07509567 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness and patient acceptance of two orthodontic appliances-conventional palatal crib and bonded spurs-in the treatment of anterior open bite in children.Twenty children aged 7 to 12 years with anterior open bite and Class I skeletal and dental relationships will be randomly assigned to one of two groups The first group will receive a conventional palatal crib appliance fixed to the upper molars, while the second group will receive bonded spurs attached to the palatal surfaces of the upper incisors , All participants will be followed for 6 months. Clinical and digital measurements, including overbite ,The results of this study are expected to help determine which appliance provides better clinical outcomes and higher patient acceptance in the early treatment of anterior open bite.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment?
Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment is a clinical trial registered under NCT07509567. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT07509567?
The current status of NCT07509567 (Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
When did Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment start?
Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs for Anterior Open Bite Treatment started on 2026-04-01.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.