Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer
NCT: NCT07538869 · COMPLETED
Brief Summary
Despite the growing diversity of materials used for mandibular fixed retainers, the evidence base remains inconclusive. In particular, conflicting findings have been reported regarding the bond failure of titanium retainers across different evaluation periods, including immediate and 12-month outcomes. Additionally, the emergence of 3D metal-printed retainers has not yet been matched by sufficient clinical evidence, with current data being limited and lacking long-term validation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer?
Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer is a clinical trial registered under NCT07538869. Current status: COMPLETED.
What is the status of NCT07538869?
The current status of NCT07538869 (Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer) is: COMPLETED.
When did Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer start?
Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer started on 2025-04-01.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.