Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, NMPA) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS

NCT: NCT07555535 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07555535
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-04
Completion2026-06

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial comparing videolaryngoscope and videoLMA for endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. The primary outcome is intubation time. Secondary outcomes include first attempt success rate, number of attempts, oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS?

Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS is a clinical trial registered under NCT07555535. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07555535?

The current status of NCT07555535 (Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS start?

Videolaryngoscope vs VideoLMA for Endotracheal Intubation in RIRS started on 2026-04.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.