Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT: NCT07589153 · COMPLETED
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for renal stones measuring 10-20 mm. The study specifically investigates whether the anatomical location of the stone (upper, middle, or lower calyx) influences the success rates and stone-free outcomes of these two surgical modalities. A total of 110 patients were randomized into two equal groups to evaluate primary endpoints, including stone-free rates at the 3-month follow-up, and secondary endpoints such as operative time and complication rates
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones?
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones is a clinical trial registered under NCT07589153. Current status: COMPLETED.
What is the status of NCT07589153?
The current status of NCT07589153 (Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones) is: COMPLETED.
When did Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones start?
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones started on 2012-05-01.
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.