Effectiveness of Light Therapy Across Seasons

Brief Summary

This study investigates whether the antidepressant effects of bright light therapy (BLT) differ between the spring/summer season and the autumn/winter season in adults with depressive disorders. While BLT is an established treatment for seasonal affective disorder, increasing evidence suggests it may also be effective for non-seasonal depression. However, it remains unclear whether its effectiveness depends on seasonal variation in natural daylight exposure. In this prospective study conducted in a routine clinical care setting, patients referred for depressive symptoms and a score of \> 6 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) receive BLT in a structured "Light Café" environment. Participants undergo daily morning light therapy sessions (30 minutes at 10,000 lux) for at least one week, with possible extension up to three weeks based on treatment response. A delayed-start design is used, where a subset of participants begins treatment two weeks later, allowing comparison with the natural course of depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms are assessed using the QIDS-SR at baseline, during treatment, and at follow-up (6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment). Sleep quality, chronotype, circadian timing, and side effects are also measured. The primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of BLT across seasons. Secondary objectives include evaluating the persistence of treatment effects, assessing the change in sleep quality and day-to-day sleep-wake pattern, and exploring whether outcomes vary by chronotype, circadian phase, and patient characteristics. This study aims to inform whether BLT should be considered a year-round treatment option for depressive disorders and to better understand factors influencing individual treatment response.