Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

EYEMAX® Versus SPYGLASS™ DS for Biliary Stricture Diagnosis

NCT: NCT07620080 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07620080
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
SponsorDavid KARSENTI (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Cholangiocarcinoma remains difficult to diagnose because of the limited sensitivity of currently available endobiliary sampling techniques. Cholangioscopy-guided biopsies performed with the SPYGLASS™ DS system have improved tissue acquisition compared with conventional brushing techniques, but diagnostic sensitivity remains suboptimal, partly because of the small diameter of the dedicated biopsy forceps. The EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system has a larger working channel, potentially allowing the use of larger biopsy forceps and improved tissue acquisition. This multicenter randomized study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of EYEMAX® versus SPYGLASS™ DS for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. The primary objective is to compare the positive diagnostic yield of the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies obtained with each system in patients with adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑