Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

LMA Protector vs I-Gel in Low-Flow Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT: NCT07707440 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT07707440
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2020-07-01
Completion2020-10-31
SponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized study aims to compare two second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SGAs), the I-Gel and the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Protector, in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under low-flow desflurane anesthesia. The study evaluates the devices in terms of respiratory mechanics (dynamic compliance, peak inspiratory pressure, plateau pressure, and airway resistance), non-invasive perfusion parameters (oxygen reserve index, perfusion index, and pleth variability index), hemodynamic stability, ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and postoperative complication rates.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑