Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques

NCT: NCT07715851 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07715851
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-08-01
Completion2028-07-31
SponsorUniversity of Malaya (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two-step angulation Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) insertion technique better for survival, stability and patient-reported outcomes. It will also learn about how the trabecular bone volume fraction measured from pre-treatment CBCT imaging influences the stability, survival, and overall clinical success of TADs. The clinical trial will be carried out among fit and healthy adults aged 18 years old above who require extraction of all four permanent first premolars, planned for maximum anchorage using bilateral maxillary and mandibular TADs. The main questions it aims to answer are: In orthodontic patients, * does the two-step angulation insertion technique for TADs provide superior survival, stability, and patient-reported outcomes, with acceptable complication rates? * how are these outcomes influenced by maxillary and mandibular trabecular bone volume fraction measured on CBCT? Researchers will compare two-step angulation insertion technique to steady oblique-angled TADs insertion technique to see it provide more superior survival, stability, and patient-reported outcomes, with acceptable complication rates. Participants will: * be taken CBCT radiography before TADs insertion * receive both TADs insertion technique either right or left on both maxilla and mandible between second premolars and first molars * fill up patient reported outcome questionnaire At immediate post-insertion (T0), post alignment (T1), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: 1 month (T2), 2 months (T3), 3 months (T4), 4 months (T5), 5 months (T6), 6 months (T7) * visit the clinic for measurement of TADs stability, clinical assessment of inflammation, mobility and the need for replacement at immediate post-insertion (T0), post alignment (T1), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: 1 month (T2), 2 months (T3), 3 months (T4), 4 months (T5), 5 months (T6), 6 months (T7)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques?

Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques is a clinical trial registered under NCT07715851. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07715851?

The current status of NCT07715851 (Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques start?

Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques started on 2026-08-01.

Related Devices

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.