Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage

NCT: NCT07777718 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07777718
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-09
Completion2028-04-30
SponsorFrancis Farhadi (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

This study is comparing two FDA-approved cages used during lower back surgery. The study will look at whether one cage helps the bones in the back fuse together better than the other. Adults who are having a 1 or 2 level lumbar fusion surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either the Adaptix nanoPEEK cage or the Capstone PTC cage. Participants will have follow-up visits with imaging and questionnaires to evaluate bone fusion, back and leg pain, physical function, and overall health.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage?

Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage is a clinical trial registered under NCT07777718. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07777718?

The current status of NCT07777718 (Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage start?

Lumbar Fusion With Nanotube Versus Titanium Cage started on 2026-09.

Related Devices

K192502Anatomic PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System, Anatomic PEEK™ PTC Cervical Fusion System, Capstone™ Spinal System, Capstone PTC™ Spinal System, Capstone Control™ Spinal System, Capstone Control PTC™ Spinal System, Clydesdale™ Spinal System, Clydesdale PTC™ Spinal System, Cornerstone™ PSR Cervical Fusion System, Crescent™ Spinal System, Crescent™ Spinal System Titanium, Divergence™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System (For Stand-Alone Interbody Device Only), Divergence-L™ Anterior/Oblique Lumbar FusMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. K182920MiRus™ Lumbar Interbody Fusion System consisting of CALLISTO™ PEEK Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF); HYPERION™ PEEK Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF); CALPYSO™ PEEK Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF); ANTARES™ PEEK Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)MiRus, LLC K191788CAPSTONE Spinal System, CLYDESDALE PTC Spinal System, CRESCENT Spinal System, CRESCENT Spinal System Titanium, DIVERGENCE-L Anterior/Oblique Lumbar Fusion SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. K251479Mobarn 80:20 Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage (PLIF)); Mobarn 80:20 Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage (TLIF)); Mobarn 80:20 Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage (DLIF)); Mobarn 80:20 Lumbar Interbody Fusion System (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage (ALIF))Mobarn Medical Devices, LLC K173787X-MESH® Expandable Cage System, OCELOT® Stackable Cage System, Stackable Cage System, Surgical Titanium Mesh System, BENGAL Stackable Cage System, BENGAL System, CONCORDE® System, CONCORDE® Inline Lumbar Interbody System, CONCORDE® Curve Lumbar Interbody System, CONCORDE® Bullet Lumbar Interbody System, COUGAR® System, COUGAR® LS Lateral Cage System, DEVEX® System, LEOPARD® System, DePuy PULSE Cervical Cage System, DePuy PULSE Lumbar Cage System, LUMBAR I/F CAGE® SystemMedos International SARL

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑