Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures

NCT: NCT07804823 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT07804823
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2024-10-01
Completion2026-05-30
SponsorAl-Azhar University (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

This study compares two different attachment systems, OT Equator and Ball and Socket, used to retain mandibular complete overdentures supported by a single dental implant. The study aims to evaluate and compare the retention of the two attachment systems over a 12-month follow-up period. The study will help determine whether one attachment system provides better and more stable retention of the overdenture over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures?

Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures is a clinical trial registered under NCT07804823. Current status: COMPLETED.

What is the status of NCT07804823?

The current status of NCT07804823 (Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures) is: COMPLETED.

When did Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures start?

Comparison Between OT-Equator Versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems in Implant-Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures started on 2024-10-01.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑