Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy

NCT: NCT07821099 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07821099
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-09-14
Completion2027-03-20
SponsorKhyber Medical University Peshawar (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare two methods of induction of labour in women with term pregnancy: concurrent use of a Foley catheter and PGE2 vaginal pessary versus sequential use of the two methods. The study will assess whether using both methods concurrently is more effective and safe than using them sequentially. The primary focus is the rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours after initiation of induction. Participants will be women with term pregnancy (37-42 weeks) admitted for induction of labour without significant comorbidities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy?

Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy is a clinical trial registered under NCT07821099. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07821099?

The current status of NCT07821099 (Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy start?

Outcome of Concurrent Versus Sequential Method of Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancy started on 2026-09-14.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.