Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws
NCT: NCT07826403 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
This study compares two methods for fixing fractures of the front part of the lower jaw: Conventional plates and screws Headless compression screws Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Researchers will use imaging to see whether either method causes a significant change in the position of the mandibular condyles, which are the parts of the jaw that connect to the jaw joints. Why it matters: Proper condylar position is important for normal jaw movement, chewing, and overall TMJ function. Main goal: To determine whether conventional plates or headless compression screws provide better preservation of condylar position after surgery. The study may help surgeons choose the most appropriate fixation technique for patients with anterior mandibular fractures.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws?
Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws is a clinical trial registered under NCT07826403. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT07826403?
The current status of NCT07826403 (Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
When did Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws start?
Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws started on 2026-09-01.
Related Devices
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.