Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws

NCT: NCT07826403 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07826403
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-09-01
Completion2027-04
SponsorCairo University (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

This study compares two methods for fixing fractures of the front part of the lower jaw: Conventional plates and screws Headless compression screws Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Researchers will use imaging to see whether either method causes a significant change in the position of the mandibular condyles, which are the parts of the jaw that connect to the jaw joints. Why it matters: Proper condylar position is important for normal jaw movement, chewing, and overall TMJ function. Main goal: To determine whether conventional plates or headless compression screws provide better preservation of condylar position after surgery. The study may help surgeons choose the most appropriate fixation technique for patients with anterior mandibular fractures.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws?

Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws is a clinical trial registered under NCT07826403. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

What is the status of NCT07826403?

The current status of NCT07826403 (Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.

When did Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws start?

Evaluation of Condylar Position After Anterior Mandibular Fracture Fixation Using Plates Versus Headless Compression Screws started on 2026-09-01.

Related Devices

K160553DePuy Synthes 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm Locking Screws – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes Wrist Fusion Plate (WFP) – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes Large Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) System –MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) System – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes Modular Foot System – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes T-Plates – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes One-third Tubular Plate with Collar (OTPC) – MR Conditional, DePuy Synthes Stainless SSynthes (Usa) Products, LLC / Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. K161616DePuy Synthes 4.0 mm and 4.5 mm Cortex Screws, DePuy Synthes 2.4 mm Cannulated Screws, DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm and 4.0 mm Cannulated Screws, DePuy Synthes 4.5 mm Cannulated Screws, DePuy Synthes 6.5 mm Cannulated Screws, DePuy Synthes 7.0 mm and 7.3 mm Cannulated Screws, DePuy Synthes 1.5 mm Headless Compression Screws, DePuy Synthes 2.4 mm Headless Compression Screws, DePuy Synthes 3.0 mm Headless Compression Screws, DePuy Synthes 4.5 mm and 6.5 mm Headless Compression ScrewSynthes USA Products, LLC K163383GREENS BRAND Locking Bone Plates and Screws Osteosynthesis Plating System, GREENS BRAND Of DHS/Dynamic Condylar Plate Plating SystemGreens Surgicals Pvt. , Ltd. K163486DRACO Locking Bone Screws; DRACO Compression Screws; DRACO MetaFuse L Plates; DRACO MetaFuse BLP Plates; DRACO MetaFuse MTP Plates, Takú Plates, DuoTakú Plates, Open Wedge Plates, Osteoplate Plates, Plantar Plates, Calcaneus Offset Locking PlatesHnm Total Recon, LLC K190035Biomet Headless Compression and Twist-Off ScrewsBiomet, Inc.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.