Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates
NCT: NCT07826416 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Brief Summary
the goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of fixing fractures in the front part of the jaw (mandible): second-generation Herbert screws and 3-dimensional miniplates. Importance: Choosing the right fixation method is crucial for proper bone healing after a jaw fracture. Participants: Patients with recent anterior mandibular fractures requiring surgery. Key Findings: The study assessed which method better maintained bone density around the fracture, indicating potential benefits for healing. Implications: Understanding the effectiveness of these methods aids healthcare providers in making informed decisions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates?
Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates is a clinical trial registered under NCT07826416. Current status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
What is the status of NCT07826416?
The current status of NCT07826416 (Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates) is: NOT_YET_RECRUITING.
When did Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates start?
Comparing Bone Healing in Jaw Fractures Fixed With Herbert Screws Versus 3D Miniplates started on 2026-09-01.
Related Devices
Official Source
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.