Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Shape on Pharyngeal Stress

NCT: NCT07868848 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT IDNCT07868848
StatusNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Start Date2026-10-01
Completion2028-01-31
SponsorMasarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s. (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Laryngeal masks are widely used supraglottic airway devices, but their cuffs differ considerably in shape and design. The cuff exerts pressure on the pharyngeal structures, which may provoke a physiological stress response and contribute to postoperative pharyngeal complaints. This prospective, randomized, two-centre trial compares three commercially available laryngeal masks with different cuff designs (SaCoVLM, LMA Supreme and Ambu AuraGain) in 162 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia induction is standardized and guided by State Entropy, and cuff pressure is standardized to 40-50 cmH2O in all groups. The primary outcome is the change in mean arterial pressure after laryngeal mask insertion. Secondary outcomes include heart rate, nociception and depth-of-anaesthesia indices (Surgical Pleth Index, Response Entropy - State Entropy difference), insertion characteristics, oropharyngeal leak pressure and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complaints up to 24 hours. The hypothesis is that cuff shape modifies the stress exerted on the pharynx and thereby influences the patient's stress response.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑