免责声明: 本站汇总 FDA、ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed、SEC EDGAR 等官方公开数据,仅供一般参考,不构成医疗建议、诊断、治疗建议或投资建议。

临床试验

CPAP vs High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Treating Sleep Apnea in Children

NCT:NCT07600333 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

NCT编号NCT07600333
状态NOT_YET_RECRUITING
开始日期2026-06-01
SponsorThe Hospital for Sick Children (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

简要摘要

This study is looking at two different treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. OSA is a sleep condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, which can affect a child's health, behavior, learning, and quality of life. Children with moderate-to-severe OSA who cannot be treated with surgery are often prescribed Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). CPAP uses a mask worn during sleep to deliver pressurized air and keep the airway open. Although CPAP is effective, many children have difficulty using it regularly because it can feel uncomfortable or hard to tolerate. This study compares CPAP with another treatment called High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC). HFNC delivers warm, humidified air through soft nasal prongs and may be more comfortable and easier for children to use while still helping keep the airway open during sleep. Children aged 2 to 18 years with moderate-to-severe OSA will be randomly assigned to use either CPAP or HFNC at home during sleep for 3 months. The study will measure how much each treatment is used, how well it improves sleep-related symptoms and quality of life, how comfortable it is for children, and how it affects caregivers. The goal of this study is to find out whether HFNC is a comfortable and effective alternative to CPAP for treating obstructive sleep apnea in children.

官方来源

在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上查看 →

数据来自 ClinicalTrials.gov API。有关最新状态,请参阅官方记录。

↑