Disclaimer: This site aggregates publicly available data from official government sources (FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR) for general reference only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or investment advice.

Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Lasers, Propolis-Based Agent, and Sham for Dentine Hypersensitivity

NCT: NCT07647861 · COMPLETED

NCT IDNCT07647861
StatusCOMPLETED
Start Date2025-12-15
Completion2026-06-10
SponsorOndokuz Mayıs University (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Brief Summary

Dentine hypersensitivity is a common clinical problem. Although Nd:YAG lasers, diode lasers, and topical desensitizing agents are widely utilized, long-term comparative evidence regarding their clinical efficacy remains limited. This prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, evaluator-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluated and compared the 12-month clinical performance of an Nd:YAG laser, a diode laser, a herbal propolis-based dentin barrier agent, and a sham application.

Official Source

View on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov API. For the most current status, refer to the official record.

↑