Avertissement: Ce site agrège des données publiques officielles provenant de la FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed et SEC EDGAR à titre de référence générale uniquement. Il ne constitue pas un avis médical, un diagnostic, une recommandation de traitement ni un conseil en investissement.

Essai clinique

Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones

NCT : NCT07589153 · COMPLETED

ID NCTNCT07589153
StatutCOMPLETED
Date de début2012-05-01
Achèvement2013-11-01
SponsorKırıkkale University (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Résumé succinct

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for renal stones measuring 10-20 mm. The study specifically investigates whether the anatomical location of the stone (upper, middle, or lower calyx) influences the success rates and stone-free outcomes of these two surgical modalities. A total of 110 patients were randomized into two equal groups to evaluate primary endpoints, including stone-free rates at the 3-month follow-up, and secondary endpoints such as operative time and complication rates

Source officielle

Voir sur ClinicalTrials.gov →

Données issues de l’API ClinicalTrials.gov. Pour connaître le statut le plus récent, consultez la fiche officielle.

↑