Avertissement: Ce site agrège des données publiques officielles provenant de la FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed et SEC EDGAR à titre de référence générale uniquement. Il ne constitue pas un avis médical, un diagnostic, une recommandation de traitement ni un conseil en investissement.

Essai clinique

Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Shape on Pharyngeal Stress

NCT : NCT07868848 · NOT_YET_RECRUITING

ID NCTNCT07868848
StatutNOT_YET_RECRUITING
Date de début2026-10-01
Achèvement2028-01-31
SponsorMasarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s. (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Résumé succinct

Laryngeal masks are widely used supraglottic airway devices, but their cuffs differ considerably in shape and design. The cuff exerts pressure on the pharyngeal structures, which may provoke a physiological stress response and contribute to postoperative pharyngeal complaints. This prospective, randomized, two-centre trial compares three commercially available laryngeal masks with different cuff designs (SaCoVLM, LMA Supreme and Ambu AuraGain) in 162 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia induction is standardized and guided by State Entropy, and cuff pressure is standardized to 40-50 cmH2O in all groups. The primary outcome is the change in mean arterial pressure after laryngeal mask insertion. Secondary outcomes include heart rate, nociception and depth-of-anaesthesia indices (Surgical Pleth Index, Response Entropy - State Entropy difference), insertion characteristics, oropharyngeal leak pressure and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complaints up to 24 hours. The hypothesis is that cuff shape modifies the stress exerted on the pharynx and thereby influences the patient's stress response.

Source officielle

Voir sur ClinicalTrials.gov →

Données issues de l’API ClinicalTrials.gov. Pour connaître le statut le plus récent, consultez la fiche officielle.

↑