Avertissement: Ce site agrège des données publiques officielles provenant de la FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed et SEC EDGAR à titre de référence générale uniquement. Il ne constitue pas un avis médical, un diagnostic, une recommandation de traitement ni un conseil en investissement.

Essai clinique

Comparison of Two Versus Four Weeks of Ureteral Stenting Prior to Ureteroscopy After Failed Primary Ureteral Access

NCT : NCT07868874 · ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

ID NCTNCT07868874
StatutENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Date de début2026-10-01
Achèvement2027-03-31
SponsorPAEC General Hospital, Islamabad (OTHER)
First posted
Last updated

Résumé succinct

This study proposes a non-randomized controlled trial comparing 2 weeks versus 4 weeks of DJ ureteral stenting in patients whose primary ureteral access failed during an initial attempt at FURS. The purpose is to determine whether a longer stenting period improves subsequent ureteral access. Participants: Adults aged 18-65 years with renal/upper ureteric stones ≤20 mm and failed primary access. Sample size: 198 patients - 99 in each group. Group A: Repeat FURS after 2 weeks of DJ stenting. Group B: Repeat FURS after 4 weeks of DJ stenting. Primary outcome: Successful placement of a 10/12-Fr ureteral access sheath during repeat FURS without additional dilation. Secondary outcomes: Stone-free rate and USSQ score. Stone-free definition: No residual stone fragment ≥4 mm on NCCT at 4 weeks after FURS. Analysis: t-test/Mann-Whitney U for numerical variables and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with p \< 0.05 considered significant.

Source officielle

Voir sur ClinicalTrials.gov →

Données issues de l’API ClinicalTrials.gov. Pour connaître le statut le plus récent, consultez la fiche officielle.

↑