FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.
PMID: 28114192 · 2017
R, i, c, h, a, r, d, , A, , M, a, l, i, n, a, u, s, k, a, s, ;, , P, r, a, s, a, n, n, a, , H, a, r, i, h, a, r, a, n, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , W, , D, a, y, ;, , L, u, k, e, , H, , H, e, r, b, e, r, t, s, o, n, ;, , M, a, r, t, i, n, , B, u, e, s, e, n, ;, , U, l, r, i, c, h, , S, t, e, i, n, s, e, i, f, e, r, ;, , K, e, n, n, e, t, h, , I, , A, y, c, o, c, k, ;, , B, r, y, a, n, , C, , G, o, o, d, ;, , S, t, e, v, e, n, , D, e, u, t, s, c, h, ;, , K, e, e, f, e, , B, , M, a, n, n, i, n, g, ;, , B, r, e, n, t, , A, , C, r, a, v, e, n
広告
抄録
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to develop blood-contacting medical devices. However, the lack of standardized methods for validating CFD simulations and blood damage predictions limits its use in the safety evaluation of devices. Through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiative, two benchmark models of typical device flow geometries (nozzle and centrifugal blood pump) were tested in multiple laboratories to provide experimental velocities, pressures, an
広告
公式ソース
PubMedで見る →データはPubMed / NCBIから取得しています。全文および最新情報は必ず公式記録をご確認ください。